Citizens along Lake Dunlap have formed a political action committee to help share information in hopes of securing a yes vote on the creation of a water control improvement district and the creation of a bond to repair Lake Dunlap’s dam.

The Committee to Restore Lake Dunlap began operating July 28, but already has a “Frequently Asked Questions” section on the website. The group hopes to campaign on behalf of Lake Dunlap Water Control and Improvement District’s ratification and passage of a bond measure to help improve the failed dam at the lake, said Larry Johnson, who started the committee.

“We’re just citizens; we didn’t really understand all of the implications of what the WCID could do or not do, what the 501(C)3 could do or not do,” Johnson said. “We learned them. What we learned was that neither of those organizations could do anything related to the election except encourage people to vote and share facts like what we have in the FAQ.”

Members of the committee as well as people involved with the Water Control Improvement District and Preserve Lake Dunlap Association have been working for months in hopes of restoring the lake that drained May 14, 2019, when spill gates failed at the aging dam.

Preserve Lake Dunlap Association got with the dam’s owner, the Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority, to hash out plans for replacing the gates and reinforcing the dam.

In recent weeks, GBRA has provided — at its expense — engineering work to help with the project, Johnson said. Also, the authority has signed a memorandum of understanding to move forward with the project in the event voters approve it in the Nov. 3 election.

GBRA has applied with the Texas Water Development Board for a loan to secure funding for the project, Johnson said. The project is expected to cost about $35 million, and a zero-percent-interest loan could save property owners hundreds of thousands of dollars, if secured, he said.

As things stand, members of the Committee to Restore Lake Dunlap are telling property owners around the lake that their property taxes could increase by about 20 cents per $100 valuation of their homes, Johnson said. The median value is about $281,341, he said.

“At 20 cents, they would pay (an additional) $563 a year, which is $47 a month,” Johnson said. “You can’t go on a weekend vacation for that. This is not a deal breaker.”

Values of the homes in the district are about $307 million, he said. The numbers are estimates but the committee believes they provide a good representation of the potential impacts on homeowners around the lake, Johnson said.

Homes valued at $96,000 or less make up about 25% of properties around Lake Dunlap, he said. Owners could pay about an additional $192 a year or about $16 a month or less, Johnson said.

The most expensive homes around the lake — valued at $1 million or more — make up about 4% of the properties, he said. With the numbers they’ve run and securing the zero-percent loan, homes valued at $1 million would pay about $2,000 a year more, Johnson said.

Preserve Lake Dunlap Association President J Harmon sits on the temporary Lake Dunlap Water Control Improvement District board and owns property along the lake.

One of the million-dollar-plus homes is his, Harmon said. He knows if voters approve the Water Control Improvement District, authorize it to levy taxes and approve a maintenance tax and operations tax for property owners in the district, he will be levied a tax increase in the higher, $2,000 range.

And that’s okay.

“It’s probably going to be a couple thousand a year,” Harmon said. “I’d rather have a lake than look at it the way it is.”

The way things are headed, Harmon will get his wish, Johnson said. Construction work could begin as early as the end of the year if voters approve the related propositions, he said.

GBRA will continue to own and maintain the dam, but the authority will put hydroelectric revenues into maintenance, Johnson said.

The restoration at the dam will be significant and come with some upgrades to make it safer, he said. Infrastructure will be improved and hopefully will last well into the future, Johnson said.

“We have renderings of what the dam will look like. It’s going to have brand new gates, completely modern dam that’s going to be remote controlled at very high levels of efficiency,” he said. “It’s going to be a nice dam because we don’t ever want to do this again. I’ve learned more about dams than I ever intended to in my life.”

Dalondo Moultrie is the assistant managing editor of the Seguin Gazette. You can e-mail him at .

Recommended for you

(1) comment


Through the pathetic stewardship of GBRA, this action is both needed and required, but folks should eye this process closely. Enabling taxes to be levied can be very beneficial, but also can be detrimental if not watched closely.

As someone who lives on the lakes, I have no intention voting for a tax district which contributes to anything other than the purchase of a new dam. Maintenance and other expenses of a new structure should be borne by the entity which was designed to manage them to begin with, GBRA.

I urge anyone associated with the lakes where new dams are to be installed to review these proposals closely and ensure that we are getting the best deal we can. There should be no reason, if the GBRA ‘approved’ structures are built that GBRA cannot be responsible to maintain and operate them without additional taxes being levied against the homeowners for this purpose. If the hydroelectric does not meet that level as a ‘most favored green energy source’ then the dam design should be looked at closely to maximize that aspect of its build.

Let’s be smart folks, please read the fine print!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.