I think it’s fair to say that most Americans believe that no one should be above the law and the overwhelming majority of us think justice is best served by a fair trial. It is generally accepted that a fair trial requires the ability of both sides to call witnesses and that evidence be presented such as documents that may be in the hands of the person on trial. That’s a standard we held to in the Senate trial of President Bill Clinton and it should apply to the Senate trial of President Donald J. Trump.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, aided and abetted by his second in command, our own Senator John Cornyn, has made it clear that he wants to avoid hearing from witnesses and the presentation of documents. Since Trump withheld thousands of documents requested by the House impeachment inquiry team and instructed White House staff to ignore subpoenas, the trial in the Senate is the last chance the American people will get to find out all the details regarding the administration withholding congressionally-approved funds for the defense of Ukraine.

In their efforts to provide cover for Trump, Republicans have claimed that all the witnesses in the impeachment inquiry were second- and third-hand witnesses. Now that the Senate is about to take up the case, all indications so far are that they will turn their backs on the opportunity to call first-hand witnesses like former National Security Advisor John Bolton and Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney, among others.

Sunday morning on “Face the Nation,” Senator Cornyn was asked directly about this and he just dodged the issue claiming that the House shouldn’t have voted to impeach without all the necessary evidence.

Cornyn’s claim relates directly to one of the articles of impeachment, abuse of power, since Trump refused to produce the documents and demanded that administration members not testify. Senator Cornyn’s circular argument shows the blatant dishonesty congressional Republicans have indulged in for months isn’t going to stop anytime soon.

Last week, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts administered an oath to all 100 senators which says in part “that in all things appertaining to the trial of the impeachment of Donald John Trump, president of the United States, now pending, I will do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws, so help me God.” Given that Mitch McConnell stated weeks ago that he is coordinating with Trump on how the Senate will handle the trial, it’s hard to imagine him acting impartially when it comes time to vote.

The American people deserve honesty from their elected officials. That means a thorough hearing of all the evidence including that which has previously been withheld, and the testimony of administration witnesses that have so far refused to testify. Anything less is a cover up and we shouldn’t stand for that.

It’s going to take our senators to vote for both of them, which means it’s going to take you to demand it of them. Call our senators this week and tell them you expect to hear John Bolton, Mick Mulvaney and others testify in the senate trial. Senator Cornyn’s office number is 202-224-2934, Senator Cruz’s office number is 202-224-5922.

JC Dufresne is a liberal activist and current member of the State Democratic Executive Committee, representing Senate District 25.

Recommended for you

(1) comment

Shepard

As usual, Mr. Dufresne seems a little...partial, though he seeks impartiality in the process.

As we painfully watched last year, the case against the President was made in the House, controlled by the Democrats, which brought into full view the ‘impartiality’ of that body. The vast majority of Democratic Representatives have been braying “Impeach that man!” since his election, and displayed absolutely no interest in due process during the recent proceedings. After watching that display, I’m sure that the Republicans have no interest in assisting in the ‘political assassination’ of a sitting President, much less one who represents their party.

Considering the critical nature of the accusation of Abuse of Power, witnesses should be allowed, and the primary witness, the whistleblower, should be REQUIRED. No one should be prosecuted without being able to face his accuser....believe that is a core part of our justice system.

In regards to the second accusation, Obstruction of Congress, witnesses and pertinent documents should be presented, after we convict Presidents Johnson through Obama of the same charges.

Mr. Dufresne says you should call Senator Cornyn’s office and demand that the Senate allow witnesses. No problem. Give the Republicans the same ability to pick and choose witnesses that the Democrats did in the House. Senator Cornyn actually was correct in stating that the House should have done their job. If they did not have everything for an ironclad bulletproof case against the President, why did they vote to impeach? If they did not have everything, but felt the President behaved inappropriately, they should have voted to censure, something that would be akin to a fat lip or black eye. The House, if they were that adamant about the case, should have gone to court to force the issue on witnesses and documents, not plowed ahead with a guilty verdict still needing additional evidence be unearthed during the Senate phase.

I’ll tell you why they’ve done what they have; theatrics and the desire to affect the upcoming election. They have no intention of allowing an impartial proceeding, any more that they did when they vetted Judge Kavanaugh. “Impartial” is not currently in their vocabulary.

I am with Senator Trey Gowdy, “Call them all, or call none”. You can’t have your cake and eat it too in this case.

We listened to Rep. Water, Pelosi, and the Representative who said to her son when she won election to Congress, “....because we’re gonna go in there and impeach that m***********r”, as they have said time and time again since the election, impeachment was to be their whole agenda over the last 3 years. Not the peoples business,....IMPEACHMENT.

So Mr. Dufresne, if you crave ‘impartiality’ as you have stated, what was your response to the House trial? Did you believe that the process was impartial? If you did, then Senator McConnell statements align with your definition.

“Call them all, including the whistleblower, or call none”

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.